Archive for the ‘Search and more’ Category

Bring on the Bing!!

Friday, June 19th, 2009

Microsoft Bing – The decision Engine

Bing is a greatly packaged replacement for the Live Search! It has a fancy and (indeed) a searcher friendly interface. The Bing team says that it lets you overcome information overload and helps you make decision faster and easier. Bing’s new features help the searcher save time and make an informed decision.

Microsoft recently published a PDF about Search Engine Optimization called Bing: New Features Relevant to Webmasters. The PDF primarily describes the user interface changes launched with Bing, and how those might impact site owners, but also touches on search engine optimization. Numerous researches carried out on how searchers read and use the search engine result pages have demonstrated a constant pattern.

The pattern has been defined as the “Golden Triangle pattern”. The Golden triangle pattern suggest that in a SERP containing a single threaded results for a query, the searchers generally scan the length of the first result and then they scan lesser amount of information for the second result and follow this ever decreasing pattern for seeking information until they mostly stop at the result # 5.

Studies also suggest that over 50% the searchers refine their search query by going back to the SERP, from a non-helpful SE result. In most cases they opt abandoning the result altogether!
The Bing interface design comes to the rescue! With categorized result pages and organized explore pane – quick tabs, related searches, search history contents of the explore pane, make it highly dynamic.

Result Type Improvements - Bing brings to you the standard “blue ink” exposing deep links within a website. When possible Bing also represents related information about the result such as, with books or movies, user ratings and links to reviews directly in the caption.

Best Match – top ranking result for any query is listed under the best match result.  A searcher can easily find related information in forms of deep links without having to go to the website and look for the information that he requires.

Instant Answers – These now offer more comprehensive information and richer results than the traditional result.

Caption improvements in Bing:

Document Preview – Document preview allows searchers to instantly preview the content from the deep link without having to go to the website.  All the searchers need to do is move the mouse pointer over the caption and they can preview a sample of the actual content on the page of the website instantly and make an informed decision about visiting the website or otherwise.

They say this helps increase qualified traffic, but some webmasters might  not want to expose the content present on the page and would like to have the visitors visit their site and get all the information that they are looking for. For them, Microsoft provides a way to opt-out of the feature.

Just add the following to the <head> section of each page:
<meta name=“msnbot”, content=“nopreview”>

Or generically for all robots:

<meta name=“robots”, content=“nopreview”>

If you don’t want this feature used on any page of the site, it might be easier to return the directive in the server HTTP header as follows:
x-robots-tag: nopreview

Flash Extraction – Microsoft says that Flash-based sites are responsible for 21% of all empty descriptions in their index. They say that Bing has implemented new technologies that can perform “limited data extraction” and has now been able to generate descriptions for one-third of those formerly empty tagged, flash based websites. Skip Flash introduction link in result feature on applicable flash based websites help the searcher get right to the content of the website.

Local Listings – It is the new Bing feature for local business searches.

With all these features that Bing offers its searchers, they say that a well done SEO expands opportunities with Bing!!

Download Bing–New Features For Webmasters.pdf and read more if you wanna Bing!

Wikiasari – Wikipedia founder to launch search engine to rival Google, Yahoo & Live

Tuesday, December 26th, 2006

The U.S. founder of the Web encyclopedia Wikipedia says his planned Internet search engine, Wikiasari, could rival Google and Yahoo!. Jimmy Wales told The Times of London his search engine, planned to launch with Amazon.com, will use the same user-based technology as Wikipedia. The commercial version of the search engine will be developed through San Mateo, California based Wikia Inc., with a provisional launch planned for the first quarter of 2007, he said.

Wikiasari gets its name from ‘wiki,’ Hawaiian for ‘quick,’ and ‘asari,’ Japanese for ‘rummaging search.’

Earlier this year Wales said he secured multimillion-dollar funding from Amazon.com and a separate cash infusion from a group of Silicon Valley financiers to finance Wikia projects.

Wikipedia, online since 2003, is written by thousands of contributors worldwide using free, open-source software. Wales said he wants to use the same network concept and free software to create his search engine.

# Following speculations and comments by the online community about Amazon’s role and Screenshot captured by Techcrunch, Wikiasari has the following clarifications:

Amazon?
Reporters and bloggers note: Amazon has nothing to do with this project. They are a valued investor in Wikia, Inc., but people are really speculating beyond the facts. This search engine project has nothing to do with A9, Amazon, etc.
Screenshot?
Update: The TechCrunch story is also wrong. This project has nothing to do with the screenshot they are running, and this search project has nothing to do with Wikipedia.

Why another Search Engine?
Mr Wales, a 40-year-old former options trader, believes that, as the popularity of Google has grown, obvious flaws in its search engine technology have become apparent.

“Google is very good at many types of search, but in many instances it produces nothing but spam and useless crap. Try searching for the term ‘Tampa hotels’, for example, and you will not get any useful results,” he said.

Spammers and commercial ventures are also learning how to manipulate Google’s computer-based search, he added. Mr Wales believes that Google’s computer-based algorithmic search program is no match for the editorial judgment of humans.

Google searches are conducted using an algorithm that calculates how many other websites are linked to a certain site, which in turn gives the material found by the search a ranking. Therefore, the first result in any Google search is the website that has the most links pointing to it. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia written by thousands of contributors from around the world, known as “Wikipedians”, using free open-source software.

Mr Wales aims to exploit the same network of followers and the same type of free software to create his search engine.

“Essentially, if you consider one of the basic tasks of a search engine, it is to make a decision: ‘this page is good, this page sucks’,” Mr Wales said. “Computers are notoriously bad at making such judgments, so algorithmic search has to go about it in a roundabout way.

“But we have a really great method for doing that ourselves,” he added. “We just look at the page. It usually only takes a second to figure out if the page is good, so the key here is building a community of trust that can do that.”

Mr Wales believes that the reputation already fostered by his Wikipedia community and the transparency of his technology will build sufficient trust in his search engine to bring in advertising revenue and make the Wikiasari venture profitable. “The revenue model of search is advertising. Transparency in search, therefore, is like transparency in news. If the quality is there people will come.”

Catching up with Google, Yahoo!, Microsoft’s MSN or even smaller operators such as Ask.com will be a difficult challenge, Mr Wales conceded.

It’ll be interesting to see how Wikiasari fares in the extremely competitive Search Engine battles – where many new search engines have gone out with a whimper.

Some of the links you should visit:

SEO monthly maintenance programs – getting it right

Thursday, November 16th, 2006

Over the years, one of the questions I have personally witnessed many of the SEO prospects ask, has been – “what about SEO monthly maintenance“? In almost all cases, after a few probing questions I realize that for a site owner, “SEO monthly maintenance” usually carries a totally different meaning than what most of the Search Engine Marketing (SEM) companies offer in their SEO Monthly maintenance programs.
For a site owner – SEO monthly maintenance usually means that the SEO company would “maintain my top top rankings” – which they will first help to achieve. However, the SEO monthly maintenance programs offered by a vast majority of SEM companies, are mostly tailored around optimizing some additional webpages on the site, running ranking reports to assess ranking variations and some other minor tweaks – which are carried out month on month. While these steps are very useful in a certain sense – but they don’t really do much in “maintaining” the organic rankings of sites which the term “SEO monthly maintenance” seems to suggest. That is where I see the confusion this term normally causes.

The term “SEO monthly maintenance” seems to have been derived from the “annual maintenance” or “monthly maintenance” services/contracts offered by web design and development companies – as an offshoot to the main development work. In this they keep the application/site up and running during the maintenance time period (normally ranging from 6 to 12 months). While maintenance might make good sense in such scenarios – it would be incorrect to borrow that term and assume it to carry the same sense and meaning in the SEM sphere.

- IMO the term should be called something else which is more indicative of the actual scope of work being carried out and which reduces the chances of it being min-interpreted by prospects/clients. It’ll save a lot of site owners from incorrect expectations from a SEO monthly program.

Perhaps calling it “SEO monthly monitoring and optimization” rather than “maintenance” would be better – because there truly is no “ranking maintenance” involved in a huge majority of these plans.

- In my opinion, the onus of clarifying the scope and “impact” of the monthly maintenance programs lies squarely with the SEM company. If they aren’t pushing only for sales numbers, they’ll take the time to explain this clearly to the client at the outset – even volunteer the information, aiming to preempt and remove any confusions in the mind of the prospect. The worst scenario for a SEM company is the ’silent customer’ – or the quick customer – who makes the buying decision rather quickly – without going into a whole lot of detail to understand / seek clarification of the various aspects of the overall plan. My recommendation in such cases would be to – re-clarify everything covered in the scope of SEO program, particularly drawing the client’s attention to the “SEO monthly maintenance program” and it’s true meaning.

If you are a site owner hiring a SEM company/expert, it is important to safe guard your interests and get to know the real deal in SEO monthly maintenance programs. These issues are usually seen more in the SEO packages – where certain set steps and number of pages are optimized in the main SEO effort – and subsequent optimization is carried out in the monthly maintenance programs.

# Important points about SEO Monthly maintenance programs:

For a business owner who is considering taking the service of a SEM company, it would help if she asks the following questions to the SEM company before signing up for their maintenance program:

a. What would the “SEO monthly maintenance program” you are offering, actually do for me?
b. Would you maintain my top organic rankings or does it mean something else?
c. How do you go about achieving and then maintaining top organic rankings for a site like mine?

The sales person of an honest and genuinely “well meaning” SEM company should take care to clarify the following:

a. What will be concretely carried out in the SEO monthly maintenance program they are offering.
b. How would the monthly maintenance add value to the client and for how long should they expect to invest in it?
c. Offer to clarify the difference between SEO monthly maintenance as per their scope – and “ranking maintenance” – as a client might have understood the program to help achieve.
d. Think about changing the name from SEO monthly maintenance to something more in tune with the actual scope of what you are offering.